Current policy intervention relevant to adult social care and its impact on one of the groups Free Essay Example, 3000 words

Such people were commonly referred to as Idiots and they were not given access to psychological therapeutic services, even as the general practitioners did not possess the appropriate awareness and knowledge to conduct specific assessments, and which could have been crucial in supporting diagnosis of their mental health issues. The administration of such institutions was shifted to local Parishes that focused on incarceration as required by the Elizabethan Poor Act. Hence, such individuals with learning disabilities were then referred to as the unattached groups a term used to those classified as a danger to the strength of the present establishment. From 1867, the Metropolitan Poor Act of 1867 replaced workhouses with asylums and which were small schools for people with learning disabilities. But unfortunately, only a small minority was taken in as the asylums became filled with social rejects (Race, 2002, p. 24). Afterwards the defective and epileptic children act of 1899 applied to those with mild mental defect, as it considered them not to be incapable of going to special classes and schools. The Mental Deficiency Act of 1913 created the first state sponsored outline of services to be offered for people with learning-disabilities (Race, 2002, p. We will write a custom essay sample on Current policy intervention relevant to adult social care and its impact on one of the groups or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now 25). However, the institutions were found on town outskirts and countryside, and they were thus isolated socially, geographically and culturally. They were mostly run-down facilities with deprived staffing levels. Such institutions did not protect the principles of safeguarding the civil and legal rights of people with learning disabilities. But instead they reinforced dependence through confinement rather than independence, as they gave the people no choices regarding how to live their lives. Furthermore, they did not support their inclusion into the mainstream services or their local community (Oliver, 1993, p. 102). Institutions like the Park House in London, Darenthpark, Lenox castle, and Fieldhead had a system of absolute social control of the residents. Hence, behaviours normally considered immoral and unethical within the society were normal practice. For instance, practice of abuse, use of unofficial and demeaning hierarchy among the institu tion patients, in addition to confinement inside isolation rooms. Most of the patients lacked the self-assurance and verbal agility to ask for assistance. Moreover, the carers, nurses and occupational therapists were not given the right environment or systems that would facilitate the provision of moral, social, cultural and economic dependence.